Further format options for classes and associations
(Thanks for being able to hide the visibility on attributes and enpoints!)
It would be nice if you could (also) hide attribute types on classes, so all you see is the attribute name and cardinality; also I would like to hide the endpoint names and association name on an association.
These changes would help me make conceptual abstractions of a detailed model for documentation, reports and papers, and it would make my job as editor of ISO/IEC19763-13 much easier!)
Thanks
steve harris
shared this idea
-
AdminStarUML
(Development Team, StarUML)
commented
To show/hide types and multiplicities is now supported in beta-8
-
AdminStarUML
(Development Team, StarUML)
commented
In my opinion, "name" should be mandatory even in conceptual abstraction.
How do you think? -
AdminStarUML
(Development Team, StarUML)
commented
Hi Steve,
Hiding types in classes, messages, instances is acceptable by "Show Type" format menu and hiding multiplicities will be supported by "Show Multiplicity" format menu. (targeted to beta-8)
However, hiding names in relationships (associations, associationEnds) is needed to be more clarified. If we add a checkable format menu "Show Name", then what about names in Classes, Interfaces, Attributes, etc? It is difficult to clarify the functionality of this feature.
Do you have any idea?
Thanks