I suggest you ...

Further format options for classes and associations

(Thanks for being able to hide the visibility on attributes and enpoints!)

It would be nice if you could (also) hide attribute types on classes, so all you see is the attribute name and cardinality; also I would like to hide the endpoint names and association name on an association.

These changes would help me make conceptual abstractions of a detailed model for documentation, reports and papers, and it would make my job as editor of ISO/IEC19763-13 much easier!)

Thanks

1 vote
Vote
Sign in
Check!
(thinking…)
Reset
or sign in with
  • facebook
  • google
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    steve harris shared this idea  ·   ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    3 comments

    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      Submitting...
      • AdminStarUML (Development Team, StarUML) commented  ·   ·  Flag as inappropriate

        Hi Steve,

        Hiding types in classes, messages, instances is acceptable by "Show Type" format menu and hiding multiplicities will be supported by "Show Multiplicity" format menu. (targeted to beta-8)

        However, hiding names in relationships (associations, associationEnds) is needed to be more clarified. If we add a checkable format menu "Show Name", then what about names in Classes, Interfaces, Attributes, etc? It is difficult to clarify the functionality of this feature.

        Do you have any idea?

        Thanks

      Feedback and Knowledge Base