Skip to content

Kevin Platt

← Customer Feedback for StarUML

My feedback

4 results found

  1. class name

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Kevin Platt supported this idea  · 

  2. Allow us to enter namespaces (slashes) into class names

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Kevin Platt commented  · 

    I totally agree with this. In C++, the :: separator is used, so you could enter a type to a method as std::vector. Whether you support a separator of slash or :: or something else, namespace entry is important. If you enter it in the inspector panel, then it looses the ability to do parsing / code generation. Also, any argument you write with invalid symbols will not be linked to actual types (so changing the name of the type will not update it in the method).

    Kevin Platt supported this idea  · 

  3. Allow us to display namespaces in a fully qualified format with double colon separators in between names

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Kevin Platt supported this idea  · 

  4. Allow "operators" (common in C++ such as == or !=) to be defined in classes

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Feature Request  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Close
    Close
    Kevin Platt shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)